Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquaflight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaflight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only scant references to the company, in my opinion failed WP:CORP and WP:GNG. The company did exist, but I don't think it pass the notability bar of inclusion in Wikipedia. SunDawn (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. SunDawn (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.