Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Araus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Araus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corp(?)/manufacturer and I can find no independent reliable coverage in any language. See also Kudpung's comment here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Spam for the Spanish agricultural machinery brand Metalfor, masquerading as a biography. Sources are mainly all blogs, ads, or primary. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per both of the above users. = paul2520 (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom. I tagged this for speedy deletion WP:A7 but it was surprisingly declined? Theroadislong (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not spam. I've read some lacks of respect about my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FLACOPAILO (talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and please do not add under expansion templates to articles that you create. Main space should not be used as a sandbox. This is not the only article you have created with this template. Domdeparis (talk) 17:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft like Draft:Construcciones Metalúrgicas Zanello. I am trying to tidy up several articles by FLACOPAILO and would like some time to complete this. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Domdeparis, do not disrespect with articles made correctly. Do not be impolite and if you do not understand the subject, try to form an opinion knowing. Thank you. FLACOPAILO (talk —Preceding undated comment added 21:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note: Only one bolded recommendation may be in place per user at a time. Since Flacopailo made a keep recommendation a few lines up the discussion, I have struck through this one. —C.Fred (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, there doesn't appear to be any indications of notability, references fail WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺13:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.