Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcturian Gate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arcturian Gate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a promotional walled garden created by a pair of single purposes accounts. Non notable business. This is a vanity label with a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. With few exceptions the bombardment of sources is PR, listings and Zone Music Reporter. Their charts are not good charts and they don't provide any coverage about this label. The Soundonsound pieces [1] [2] do not mention this company or aomusic or Tiger & the Helix and are Wikipedia:Fictitious references. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I have checked the nominator's claims, and concur. Walled garden, non-notable label. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as, put aside the named mentions of other people, there's simply nothing for actual substance here and there's nothing for a convincing independent article hence delete which is the solution for solving such concerns. SwisterTwister talk 00:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.