Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area image compression

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Area image compression

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable image processing stub which provides no context or references. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology -related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ross HillTalk to me! 02:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice. Not enough context to tell what this article wants to be about. ~KvnG 21:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The writing us unclear, but this looks like a description of a simple image compression algorithm for image with large relatively uniform regions. It is somewhat related to compression using a Hilbert curve scanning algorithm. But I was unable to find any RS under this particular title, so it seems to fail WP:GNG guidelines. --Mark viking (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.