Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arindam Banik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12 (unambiguous copyvio of https://in.sagepub.com/en-in/sas/author/arindam-banik) by Ronhjones. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arindam Banik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find independent coverage online making it fail WP:GNG, and also it fails WP:NACADEMIC. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. GS Citations not quite there. I have noticed that BLPs that described their subject as "Dr" or "Professor" can often be of dubious quality. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Remark: I just remembered: As this is part of WP:DELSORT/INDIA, it may be a good idea to check out WP:INDAFD.--Mr. Guye (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in the case his professorship is in fact an Honorary one, as shown by the faculty listing here, and it seems the school is in fact the country's first corporate-sponsored business school, it's sufficient. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

according to which Wikipedia policy is it "sufficient"?

WP:PROF. I will say that I was questionable at first, but the Honorary position may be enough at least. SwisterTwister talk 00:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Subject meets WP:PROF#5 (named chair) and may be also #6 (director of a notable institution). But the article is a WP:COPYVIO of [1]. Anup [Talk] 22:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.