Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Apparao Jadhav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I'm not ready to Salt this page unless it has been recreated a few times in main space but this could very well happen over the next few months. In general, it's good to be skeptical of articles whose subjects are "entrepreneurs" under 25 years of age for unknown companies. Most are destined to be CSD A7s, G11s or to be sent to AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Apparao Jadhav

Arjun Apparao Jadhav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I draftified it once, see [1] and it was moved to mainspace by the creator again see [2]. I haven't found any RS in the article and the subject clearly does not pass WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 17:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep I have Seen all RS. these all matches with WP guidlines.and its a early stage entreprenure and i hope that will help this entreprenure to his upcoming life.i also cheack his bussiness site this is awsome its a storytelling platform for childrens or teenagers world changing concept to bulid character of upcoming generations.that man deserves it.to be on WP.some times we have to go beyond the past rules or belif to make something great change in society StoryReader1999 (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Struck vote by sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Hi User:StoryReader1999, I couldn't help but notice that your comments on this AfD were your very first edit on Wikipedia. How did you find out about this AfD? If you have a connection to the author or subject of this article you should disclose it. MCE89 (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      account is new due to some technical fault my account is vanished. so i'm not new on WP.and i dont have any connection with this article or subject.i found it here /wiki/Wikipedia:XfD_today i have contributed in verious articles StoryReader1999 (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:Keep this page is keepable. due to WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. this article is not deletable Pune-Writer (talk) 21:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Struck sock vote.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that commenting on this AfD was User:Pune-Writer's very first edit to Wikipedia as well. MCE89 (talk) 21:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And they have been blocked as a sock of the same person as the struck-out comment above. Spike 'em (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a matter of procedure, I restored the sources. Generally, it's not a good idea to remove things from an article while it is at AfD.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ok, I've merged the refs instead as there were multiple links to the same pages. As a review of the sources:
    • AtoZInsta.com the footer saysCopyright 2024 : By - AtoZInsta and clicking on AtoZInsta takes you to subject's Insta page
    • GetExtra is the "about" page of website created by subject, so cannot be used to establish notability.
    • fmmarathi, footer links to same insta page as above, the about us link states the Founder and CEO is the subject.
    • kukufm seems to be a podcast platform, so content is likely UGC.
    Spike 'em (talk) 10:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete This article doesn’t have enough reliable sources to prove the person’s notability. Overall, it feels more promotional than informative. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 05:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Reads like WP:PROMO. All the sources on the page are primary, unreliable and paid publicity. The subject has not made a significant impact and did not make any achievement worthy of notice nationally or internationally. The subject is not notable enough to warrant a full fledged article on himself. RangersRus (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Apparao Jadhav, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.