Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ark Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 07:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ark Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill company article written like an advertisement and with unreliable sources. » Shadowowl | talk 21:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Sorry to say, self-serving promotional article for a company that has little sales. No information outside self-promotional pieces listed. ShoesssS ^Talk 18:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet notability requirements. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 22:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lack of independent sourcing. Does not meet GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Horribly promotional writing. Google currently brings up nothing, apart from a dead website. The last facebook post seems to have been on 1 September 2015, when a kickstarter failed to reach required funding so I suspect better sources will not be forthcoming. Curdle (talk) 08:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.