Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artemest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most likely PAID-PROMO-SPAM.Nothing notable.Semi-G11able mess with typical news about fundings etc. Winged Blades^Godric 06:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obvious UPE. I blocked the creator for terms of use violations because of this article. It is excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTSPAM, also no independant enough sources are there. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. Article is promotional and fails WP:SPIP. Also fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺18:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Delete There are no indications of the companies notability. Article lacks sufficient sourcing from independent sourcing. Spam article.desmay (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]