Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arya Permana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arya Permana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:GNG. The content is also entirely unsourced and as an orphan page. CPORfan (talk) 07:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC) (Blocked sockpuppet of BFDIFan707, see investigation)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Health and fitness, and Indonesia. CPORfan (talk) 07:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment whilst I'm undecided on the merits of keeping the article, it is well sourced, so that claim is false. Spike 'em (talk) 09:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Well-sourced, no need for deletion present

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep it has now have sources, no reason for delete it. CPORfan (CPORfan) 09:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC) (Blocked sockpuppet of BFDIFan707, see investigation)[reply]
• Comment Being the world's fattest child (morbidly obese) is perhaps something that doesn't require an article, could be mentioned maybe briefly in another article. There are sources, but I don't think the person would be at GNG otherwise. If kept, we'd need to balance out the article so it doesn't focus solely on the obesity, it's not NPOV and rather one-sided. The article as it stands now can almost be used to shame the person. Oaktree b (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree with Oaktree b generally. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Well, the nominator, a sockpuppet, withdrew their nomination but there are still editors that have weighing their opinion in this discussion so I can't just close it. I don't see policy reasons to Keep or Delete this article it the discussion is open for another week or until consensus is reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If this article is kept, it needs to be closely scrutinized for protection of the subject's privacy per WP:BLP, as the subject is still a minor, is relatively unknown, and is not a public figure. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Coverage is one-sided, only talking about the obesity. NPOV isn't possible as we know nothing about the person, other than their weight. Systemic bias would be introduced as we are only talking about the weight issue, the individual lives in a non-western country where media is perhaps more sensational that what we require to balance the sources.

  Oaktree b (talk) 22:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The article perhaps meets WP:GNG I will admit, but Metropolitan90 makes a very good point that this is a private individual who is a minor, and coverage only covers their obesity. This additionally seems to fall under WP:BLP1E, which means that we should not have an article for this individual at this time. - Aoidh (talk) 22:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.