Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashfaq Abbasi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashfaq Abbasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clear notability fail. There's no information that source for his single important game is reliable in the first place. Delete. Macktheknifeau (talk) 08:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep passes WP:NCRIC having played in a first-class match. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Presumption of notability is not the same as actual notability. Being included in the scorebook of a single cricket game does not automatically mean he as a person has multiple significant sources that confer notability. Macktheknifeau (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Sukkur cricket team Has played 1 FC match, but I couldn't find any coverage. Sources may exist offline or in Pakistani sources but I couldn't find any in a search. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY were a player with one or a few matches, but no coverage, is redirected/deleted, and there is a suitable WP:ATD here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No significant coverage or reason to expect any exists so fails WP:GNG. This trumps any trivial meeting of NCRIC criteria, by virtue of playing one match in one of the 6 (six) first-class competitions held in Pakistan during the 1975/76 season. List of Sukkur cricketers would be an accepted ATD redirect target but this only exists as a redirect. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even close to meeting GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - GNG is clearly not met. No prejudice against a redirect to List of Sukkur cricketers at a later date if that article can be established. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.