Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AsiaXPAT
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
AsiaXPAT
- AsiaXPAT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no assertion of notability (and no references to use to judge notability) RJFJR (talk) 00:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as no clear context for an imaginably better article at all for the applicable notability, overall not convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with SwisterTwister, very little could be done to improve this article, doesn't seem notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 11:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Article is about a company and does not appear to make (or have made) a credible claim of significance. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG. No reliable sources to show significance as of now. DarthVader (talk) 09:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.