Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asmad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asmad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly sourced BLP with no evidence of meeting WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. I could find nothing better than squad list mentions in Viva and Bola, which are nowhere near where we need to be in terms of depth of coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Indonesia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. On my own careful search for WP:RS WP:SIGCOV, I see no suitable sources to indicate that the article subject has WP:NOTABILITY. Keeping could be considered if the article subject was notable, however, WP:GNG is not met. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.