Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspire Systems (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aspire Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable business; significant RS coverage cannot be found. Created by Special:Contributions/Udip21 with no other contributions.

A 2010 AfD closed as keep, but I believe it's a good time to revisit as the article is still highly promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "Great place to work" is a trivial distinction, and essentially a rotating PR feature. There's nothing else. DGG ( talk ) 00:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearcut advertising as, not only other articles of this nature are, but the fact literally everything here was to only advertise the company, everything behind it shows it, therefore if there's advertising in everything listed, there's nothing else beyond it. The 2010 AfD shows how no one actually considered the concerns at the time, especially with the current severity now, thus it's not applicable to compare this with it. SwisterTwister talk 01:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as I don't see where this has been improved since the first time it was put up; still has the same problems; reads like a promotion press release and fails WP:Corp. Kierzek (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom Spiderone 12:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.