Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for Scottish Public Affairs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Association for Scottish Public Affairs
- Association for Scottish Public Affairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable group with zero evidence of good coverage with the best results from my searches here and here. SwisterTwister talk 02:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: I am finding passing mention of this group in articles relating to the regulation of lobbyists (a 1999 lecture, 2001 article in The Sunday Herald (via Highbeam, subscription reqd.), 2003 book, 2014 article in The Scotsman), but none of these rises to the substantial coverage of the group itself needed for WP:ORGDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I'm finding exactly the same stuf as AllyD. Nothing to denote notability in any of the searches. Onel5969 TT me 04:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.