Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assoun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 11:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assoun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

acks notability. All the clan articles in the category of 'Jat Clans of Punjab' face the same issue. Most of them are as if there are listed in a clans directory, WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 16:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. Much of the information is self-contradictory. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. With no sources, it's difficult to determine even whether this information is real or not, but either way notability isn't established (and would probably be very difficult to establish). FalconK (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.