Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atif Mian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep; nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atif Mian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. cited ref are not reliable. Saqib (talk) 08:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. His citation count alone warrants keeping as per WP:NSCHOLAR. His first 10 counts are 1463, 1563, 512, 654, 611, 484, 329, 388, 300, and 250. That's a pretty clear indication of their importance in their field. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Princeton full prof who holds a named chair with an HI ~30...please close this. Agricola44 (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw this was my mistake. --Saqib (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.