Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atmaprajnananda Saraswati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atmaprajnananda Saraswati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Expired but declined PROD as it was previously deleted. Result of the previous deletion discussion at an alternative title was delete. I still think the subject fails WP:NAUTHOR and the WP:GNG. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Hinduism, and India. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Poor to unreliable to self published sources and blogs mostly with some deadlinks. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:PROF. Subject authored two books and neither are notable. I cannot find subject's work that has made any significant impact and achievement to be worthy of notice and noteworthy. Fails WP:NBIO. RangersRus (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.