Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has little reliable source coverage. Only ones I could find were these: [1], [2], [3], [4]. The sources listed do not give significant coverage; therefore, the article's subject fails the GNG. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 06:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 06:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Does not demonstrate notability as above, while cited sources are from sites of dubious quality as well as forums and Giant Bomb which are unreliable sources. MimirIsSmart (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.