Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atta Ur Rehman IIPL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Atta Ur Rehman IIPL

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems non-notable. Looking at search results, all I see is Linkedin, the official IIPL website (IIPL is the organisation he runs), and a few unreliable sources. Created by a user with a clear COI regarding the topic. Plant🌱man (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out and highlighting the conflict of interest (COI) guidelines. I appreciate Wikipedia’s commitment to maintaining neutrality, verifiability, and reliability in all articles.

I acknowledge the importance of avoiding undue influence when contributing to topics directly related to an individual or organization. My intent is to ensure that information about Atta Ur Rehman IIPL remains accurate, neutral, and supported by credible sources. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s COI policies and, moving forward, I will:

- Refrain from directly editing the article and instead suggest edits on the talk page using reliable third-party sources.

- Ensure full disclosure of my affiliation when discussing potential edits, in compliance with Wikipedia’s transparency guidelines.

- Avoid promotional content or external link spamming, ensuring that all suggested content aligns with Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and verifiability.

If there are any specific concerns regarding the existing content, I would be happy to address them and collaborate in improving the article based on independent sources. Please let me know how best I can proceed while respecting Wikipedia’s policies.

Best regards, Atta Ur Rehman IIPL (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the COI disclosure. However, the main thing about this article is that it is not covered in-depth by independent, reliable sources; i.e., it does not meet the criteria outlined at WP:NBLP. Looking online, I could only find the IIPL website, Linkedin, YouTube, and 1 2 3 these three. The last three I listed have no significant coverage of the person in question, and the IIPL website, Linkedin, and YouTube are not considered reliable sources. I hope this helps. Plant🌱man (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your clarification sir. I have added some reliable news sources. Moreover, the article will updated from time to time. Looking forward your guidance in this regard. Atta Ur Rehman IIPL (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your sources have been removed because they are "not in line with WP:EL". Please add another source. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Atta Ur Rehman IIPL I would like to point out that notability isn't something that you can change. It's an inherent property of the subject; if they are notable, then they will have multiple independent, reliable sources about them. Unfortunately that does not seem to be the case here, meaning that if the subject isn't notable, there is nothing a person can do to "make" them notable. Plant🌱man (talk) 17:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: GPT-zero shows 100% AI-generated text. Please tell us in your own word ~~what you can do to improve this article~~ why the article shouldn't be deleted. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No coverage that I can find, the only hit is this [1], likely about another person. The sourcing in the article isn't helpful either in showing notability, Crunchbase and the first source aren't RS. The other two are name drops. Oaktree b (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. Veldsenk (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b too. Ramos1990 (talk) 22:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.