Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubryists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Socialist Party (France)#Factions. Any content worth merging can be pulled from the page history. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aubryists

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Short mention under Socialist Party (France)#Factions is more than enough. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and France. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Socialist Party (France)#Factions. No Google News results for "Aubryist" or "Aubryists". starship.paint (talk / cont) 08:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I won't support redirect as this article has zero citation/reference to pass WP:GNG Tesleemah (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tesleemah: [1] [2] mention the term. Though indeed this is a rare term. starship.paint (talk / cont) 12:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I can only see External links here, also there are no inline citations Tesleemah (talk) 12:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Oh OK!
  You were referring to WP:BEFORE. Not bad then Tesleemah (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with Socialist Party (France). I do not support redirect because this is already mentioned in the party's main article as a faction. Mekomo (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Socialist Party (France)#Factions: Because this is already mentioned in the party's article as a faction is more reason it makes sense to redirect it there. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.