Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audiojack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phone connector (audio). Philg88 ^♦talk 08:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Audiojack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this entity meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability. Pink Bull 15:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ~~Audio jack~~ Phone connector (audio) as this could be used as an alternative spelling for it. –Davey2010 • (talk) 10:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't oppose that idea except to note that audio jack redirects to Phone connector (audio).--Pink Bull 01:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted :) Thanks for noticing the error :), –Davey2010 • (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.