Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Waugh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steve Waugh. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Waugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per this discussion, another U19 cricketer who doesn't yet meet WP:NCRIC. Mainly notable because of his father. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable enough, and notability is not inherited. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not yet notable. Can be recreated when he is. If he is. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. If and when he debuts in the three main formats, then he can have an article! StickyWicket (talk) 22:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Probable Redirect to Steve Waugh for now. Tricky - although almost all of the coverage mentions his father, at least in passing, there are examples of exactly the type of independent, in depth sources that we need to pass GNG: this, this and this in particular - none are match reports, all have some decent depth. Frankly that's a lot better than we can do on many biographies. If he does ever play a top class cricket match then the match report for that will likely also mention his father and his father will likely be the reason for the depth in that report. There's a case for keeping the article, but on the whole I think a redirect is more likely - Arjun Tendulkar and Tom Healy (cricketer) are both redirects in not dissimilar situations for example. Redirecting also preserves the work already in place. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This cricketer has not played any First Class or List A cricket.Fail WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Steve Waugh (and edit that article to include a mention of Austin and his cricketing progress) until he meets NCRIC. The-Pope (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Steve Waugh as in the case of Arjun Tendulkar.--RHcosm (talk) 01:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Blue Square Thing. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.