Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Wild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Wild

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with minimal local news coverage (all from the same source Community Impact Newspaper, mostly brief mentions in the "Local Events" section and the one article about the Wild signing a lease to play in the H-E-B Center, which they have since lost) and a few WP:ROUTINE game coverage from other teams. The article seems to have been created with "presumed notability" as they claim they are professional, however, there is no guideline for such a claim in WP:NORG (specifically WP:ORGSIG) and we must judge on GNG alone. As this is currently a travel-only team that played a single home game (of which, I can find no independent coverage from against a semi-pro team), it is either WP:TOOSOON for significant coverage or possibly just not notable. Yosemiter (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. 10^Eleventeen 16:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not enough opinions to form consensus...Leaning delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — F R ⁺ 05:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.