Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Aboriginal identity
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Canley (talk) 11:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Australian Aboriginal identity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be WP:OR I don't see a reason for this to be separate from the Aboriginal Australians article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I'm looking at a lengthy article with almost fifty references, including newspapers, journal articles, books and legal documents. You're going to need more than "appears to be OR" as the rationale for deletion. — Toughpigs (talk) 00:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is a significant issue, heavily covered by experts and a range of other reliable sources, and the article seems OK. Nick-D (talk) 09:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep appears not to be. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 12:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Snow Keep - it is simply not true that this is original research. Deus et lex (talk) 12:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to be up for deletion JarrahTree 13:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, Withdraw no reason for this to be up for deletion, and I regret calling it in retrospect. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.