Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoTempest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article, or whether or not they "work". An article being in an orphaned state is also not a valid rationale for deletion. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AutoTempest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this article is orphaned and the references do not work, it seems this article does not show general notability. Given this, I am proposing to have this article deleted. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not sure what the nom is referring to when they say the "references do not work". All but 1 worked fine for me. That being said, most are just primary or listings. However, 2 (WiseBread and Hooniverse) are two in-depth sources about it, so that would suffice for some editors. For others, there appears enough other sourcing online to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.