Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Addams (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ava Addams

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of a previously much discussed and deleted article. G4 declined so here we are. The new sources are mostly nonRS or articles about a bus with her picture (alongside others) painted on the side. Written a little too puffery and clearly fails GNG and PORNBIO Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep This has been on and off wikipedia a few times, however she has been nominated and won a couple of awards. Along with her large collect of works. This seems to pass WP:PORNBIO as far as I can see. Govvy (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How does she pass pornbio? None of the awards pass muster and nominations no longer count. Do you have a policy based argument?Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See in article: she has won a well-known and significant industry award, no scene award - meets of WP:PORNBIO #1. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 02:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - weak but meets of the WP:PORNBIO and also propably WP:GNG. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 16:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what are the rs and evidence for this assertion?Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See in article: she has won a well-known and significant industry award, no scene award - meets of WP:PORNBIO #1. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 18:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmoves MILf, nope, and two scene awards? I'm confused. How does this BL P meet gng? Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When industries churn out awards like candy we should ignore them and come up with more logical standards of notability, which Adams does not meet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Addams (4th nomination). --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No new facts since the previous deletion. The references added that prevented a G4 speedy are junk. One is a user comment, one is a trivial mention, one is dubious opinion piece, and one appears to be a Wordpress site that blocks IP's by country. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt as per my last AFD !vote - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.