Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviareps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aviareps

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this company is notable. Sources are primary or routine coverage. Jdcooper (talk) 19:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Aviation, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~●Keep-~~ ~~https://www.visitorlando.com/media/press-releases/post/visit-orlando-names-aviareps-for-international-global-trade-representation/ PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

@PaulGamerBoy360:, surely a press release is both a primary souce and routine coverage? Jdcooper (talk) 21:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there are many news articles focusing on this company, I provided the link to one of the more reliable sites, i will list the other links in the article. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Essentially a brochure to advertise the company. Fails WP:NCORP. WP:DEL14 scope_creep^Talk 21:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a company of this size is generally notable in my opinion. There are some paid industry reports on it https://digitgaps.com/report-store/aviareps-ag-company-profile-financial-and-strategic-swot-analysis-mergers-and-acquisitions-partnerships-and-investments-news-key-profiles-and-competitors-report/, https://www.creditsafe.com/business-index/en-us/company/aviareps-ag-de00830355. A lot of business deal articles too, although some might be press releases. - Indefensible (talk) 04:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

●Delete- Although this company evidently is large & has many partners, the only coverage we can find is Routine Coverage. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of press releases and 'soft' interviews with management and connected parties. Haven't seen much independent comment/evaluation of the company, so don't think there's sufficient independent coverage to satisfy WP:NCORP. The first source listed by User:Indefensible may help towards notability. Don't see how the second source, a credit report does. This in the article may also help [1], none of the other references IMO do. Needs more independent coverage to pass WP:ORGIND. Rupples (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.