Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AvoDerm (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AvoDerm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product; reads like an advertisement; was nominated for speedy but declined as "weird". Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and California. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Besides one piece from CBS Philadelphia about their salmonella outbreak in 2012, only references I could find to AvoDerm were in pet ownership blog/web pages (low-quality, listicle format). Does not seem to meet notability guidelines. InsomniaOpossum (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The promotional article lacks sources and reviewing media only brings up promotional content, not content from reliable sources 🄻🄰 13:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.