Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B2B Pay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
B2B Pay
- B2B Pay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; rationale was: "Does not meet WP:CORP, as none of the independent sources (bar the article by Thomas Ohr) provides in-depth coverage."
Since then, all the references have been replaced by new ones, and the Thomas Ohr article is bizarrely gone as well. Of the new refs, there's just one that comes close to being WP:RS (the article by Sven Korschinowski), but it is devoid of anything that could be used for an encyclopaedic entry. Before prodding, I checked for reliable sources myself but drew a blank. Schwede66 09:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH due to a lack of coverage. The article subject is an investment bank, but fails to show how it is different from other banks and as such fails WP:MILL.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. -- Dane talk 20:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.