Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDA Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BDA Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable.

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: A series of August 2015 edits by a WP:COI editor User:Bdallc left the article with primary sources and removed various listed awards. Viewing this earlier version may be more appropriate to assess whether there is sufficient notability. AllyD (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- self-sourced / weakly sourced corporate spam and just a firm going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just corporate Spam. do not adhere standards set by Wikipedia. Light2021 (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.