Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BHK Bhalla@Halla.Kom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BHK Bhalla@Halla.Kom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to indicate notability. Search engine do not indicate much notability either. Clearly fails WP:NFILM. Coderzombie (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I was a bit skeptical at first, but I found some reviews for the movie after doing some digging. They were pretty well buried under a bunk of junk hits - I think it was because the film's name is formed like an email address. Anywho, I did some general cleaning and sourcing so I think it should pass now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article has been improved to include reviews from reliable sources such as Times of India, now passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.