Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BI/TAS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BI/TAS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability requirements for software. A search for "BI/TAS" does not seem to return any relevant hits. All eight Google results for "Bill Inquiry/Toll Adjustment System" originate from Wikipedia. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Good catch. The screen shot might imply is from the year 2003, although the article seems to have appeared in 2007 or so. As above, no indication it ever got close to being notable enough to merit its own article. Cannot think of a place to merge, and there is no source at all, so is likely just someone's recollection who worked on it back then. W Nowicki (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.