Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIG4books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BIG4books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable, fails WP:V and also violates WP:PROMOTION. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:SPA promotional material, absolutely no sourcing found. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I'm unable to find evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.  gongshow  talk  08:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.