Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Dozen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

B Dozen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically the same rationale as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Hoechlin (same creator). Highly promotional and I see no sources here or anywhere else of sufficient quality to establish notability. — Anonymous 21:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, and Tanzania. — Anonymous 21:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Radio personalities aren't automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on substantive reliable source coverage about them — but this is referenced almost entirely to short promotional blurbs rather than substantive sourcing, and claims nothing about his career that would be "inherently" notable without better sourcing than just short PR blurbs. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.