Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Buta Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sant Nirankari Mission. That there aren't enough good sources appears uncontested. Sandstein 21:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Buta Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously CSDed and deleted as WP:A7, and even now does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Some of the sources provided in the article are not independent of him. Searches show sources that mention him trivially and no in-depth coverage found in reliable sources to qualify for GNG. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a founder of a major religious sect with a sizeable population, I think he becomes notable to have an article on Wikipedia. --Walrus Ji (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. As an alternative solution incorp. into Sant Nirankari Mission. I don't see a reason for a separate article as the subject fails notability. Kolma8 (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.