Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Sen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 08:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Sen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a few human interest stories about you tube videos is not notability DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Subject is notable and has enough coverage to warrant a Wikipedia article from reliable sources such as the BBC. I'm the creator of this article. Neptune's Trident (talk) 03:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Minimal references, all of which appear to be "slow news day" articles, and only four Wikipedia articles (excluding project or talk pages) link to it, so it's a near-orphan as well as a stub. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO1E; nn Youtuber with only passing coverage. Wikipedia is not a tabloid; no lasting significance or notability here. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.