Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby's First Test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baby's First Test (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reliable source coverage I can find of this website is press releases and things written by employees of the website or the Genetic Alliance who run it. Sam Walton (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as my searches obviously found nothing better at all including from when GimliDotNet first tagged it in March 2012, clearly no further signs of better notability and improvement for a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.