Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahari iBaadat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bahari iBaadat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Beauty titles are minor in nature. Article borders on self-promotion. reddogsix (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Really no evidence she passes GNG in any way, or even approaches it. Mabalu (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Require reliable sources to meet the general notability guidelines, I am not sure if the references are available in local language. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GNG - Lack of significant secondary sources in the article. I did a google search and it stopped at page 5 with 44 results, not a single reliable source. Any significant modern subject would return more hits on google. - Taketa (talk) 04:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - http://www.iexaminer.org/2014/10/record-number-of-pan-asian-contestants-in-miss-washington-usa-miss-washington-teen-usa-competitions/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:4200:CD1:D12:4061:582C:A2D3 (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it is a reliable secondary source, though it does not make her very noteworthy because it is only a short mention in a large list, not an in dept coverage focusing on the subject. If you could provide multiple of these sources and at least one in dept, then I will reconsider. - Taketa (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=792745630767018&set=a.334884789886440.70978.100000947651422&type=3&theater https://www.facebook.com/RealBahariibaadat?ref=hl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.50.101.211 (talk) 01:49, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is not a reliable secondary source. - Taketa (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.