Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balghar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balghar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been in CAT:UNREF for 16 years. I was unable to find reliable sources to confirm it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There should at least be one reference to verify that this place indeed exists and meets WP:GEOLAND.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. There are rock carvings (petroglyphs) and inscriptions near Balghar. See this reference:Journal of Asian Civilisations. Taxila Institute of Asian Civilisations. 2000. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 19:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Added 4 more references to the article. Cleaned up and removed some unsourced content...Ngrewal1 (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balghar, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.