Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamboo display
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 10:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Bamboo display
- Bamboo display (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Extremely clear example of WP:MILL. Should we create long articles on aluminium, PVC, glass, fibre or such displays? "This same method is also used in some hotel bathrooms to hang towels." Oh boy... FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominated. Bamboo is used to make stuff, end of story. Article sources (& what I can find) routine product hits, ie people selling & making the stuff do not establish any notability.TheLongTone (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Tentative Delete - The article is actually really well written. If bamboo displays are really a *thing* in the save the planet crowd, I'd like to see it kept. Unfortunately the article is basically completely unsourced. If the author can provide some reliable sources for the article, I'll gladly vote to keep the article. :-) Bali88 (talk) 22:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.