Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Proo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Proo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians, Women, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A worthy citizen but no evidence of notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG The source (the only one) doesn't elaborate and fails SIGCOV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 01:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, barely any secondary sources which are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN. Shaws username (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.