Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedaag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bedaag

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a Bollywood film. The first two citations are to the same copy of the film on YouTube; which is of questionable legality, a comment says that the second hour of sound is missing. Of course, the video wouldn't be WP:RS even if complete. The third is a listing site which links to IMDb (non-RS). The fourth and last is IMDb itself. The plot in the article is identical to the one in IMDb, and may be a WP:COPYVIO. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing WP:RS, not even another description of the plot. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable film with no citations found during online search. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - due to WP:GNG and WP:NFILM concerns Spiderone 09:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Spiderone. // Timothy :: talk 23:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.