Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beep: A Documentary History of Game Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 02:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beep: A Documentary History of Game Sound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film from non notable director sourced to Kickstarter and IMDB. Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I only found the sources provided in the article, if you believe they are not good enough, please proceed with the deletion. Cheers! 3BRBS (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the article now has references to sig cov in The Japan Times and Billboard Atlantic306 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although those two sources listed above are legit, I don't see how they are enough to keep the article from being considered unnotable. The current article only has four sentences, and getting rid of the other sources would only make that smaller. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 10:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen more sources have been added, and also as of today, I added a source from PC Gamer which seems reputable in the field, and some information depicted in the article. If you wish to check again the article, you are welcome. Cheers :] 3BRBS (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The new sources are good, but I still see the issue of how this article would ever expand out of being a single paragraph long. It could basically be merged into video game music with no issues. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I actually expanded the article a bit by adding content present in the source, but then you removed that content and wrote: "keeping PCG source, but getting rid of the mostly copy pasted sentence that explains very little out of context". Indeed it seems contradictory when you say "how this article would ever expand", when on the other hand you are removing content. Sorry to say this, but you are sort of playing the role of judge and jury. Since the infomation was present in the source, I see no wrong or harm on keeping it :] 3BRBS (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it since it was mostly just copypasted from the article in an attempt to add more info. I kept the citation, if you didn't see. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 05:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since the article now has even more references, including: PC Gamer, CNET, The Daily Dot and Polygon. 3BRBS (talk) 04:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if not merge to video game music. Definitely not a delete. JOE BRO 64 15:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, not a delete. Has reliable coverage, notable enough to exist independently, even if it lacks content or not. --QEDK (桜 ❄ 伴) 17:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. PhilKnight (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.