Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beepity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beepity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company has just opened, so no chance to establish notability. No reliable independent sources to indicate otherwise. Fails WP:CORP. Contested speedy delete. WWGB (talk) 05:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a firm with four employees which is in its first month of operation. The article contains no claim to notability and lacks any sources. Nor are my searches identifying anything to remedy this. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: I feel that this is an A7 candidate, and have tagged it as such. I know that the user has removed tags on this before, but that is the role for an administrator. If they want to contest, they can press the big blue button - not just remove the tag. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 10:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy delete tag was not removed by the article creator, but by a different editor, which is permissible under Wikipedia rules. I don't think a speedy delete tag can be re-added when it has been legitimately removed. WWGB (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - didn't see that it was 2 separate people. Thanks for the clarity - but nevertheless, I feel this is speedy worthy. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 14:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.