Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellacor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bellacor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. My WP:BEFORE search turns up a number of press releases, but nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV or NCORP. Minor mentions of the company are made in references to the GrabYourWallet campaign (Bellacor was a target of said campaign), but again nothing explicity about Bellacor. I will also note that the company, founded in 2000, has only 65 employees and (as before) a noticeable lack of coverage of any kind.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above, unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺12:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.