Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bemular

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ultra Monsters. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bemular

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the relevant list of characters as none of them have notability outside of the series. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment TNN I've noticed you've been nominating several of these Ultraman characters for deletion recently. For convenience reasons, next time it would probably be a good idea to put all of them in a single AFD page (like what was done here) instead of each having its own nomination. The opinions of most people !voting would probably be the same for each nomination anyway. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultra Monsters, which already has it in the list. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 08:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.