Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin De Almeida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin De Almeida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable YouTuber. The only source is their channel, and I found no reliable sources online. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Canada. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a bundle of WP:BLP violations wrapped up in a cheerful demeanor and ready to explode. If this and that were reliable, then it could be the start of a stub. I'm not opposed to userfication, but don't hand it off to me. Bearian (talk) 03:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Good for him thathis Zoom account was deleted, but came back again, I guess, but this is not a pass of WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.