Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernedoodle
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Poodle crossbreed. Sandstein 09:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bernedoodle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable dog hybrid. Source 1 is a kennel website which is entirely unacceptable, 2 is a scrape website, 3 and 5 and 6 aren't about the breed, 4 and 9 are the same kennel websites, 7 is a self-published book and 8 doesn't mention the breed at all. Google shows only kennel websites and breed-scrape websites, neither of which establish notability. Could potentially be rolled into part of this, but this crossbreed wouldn't even jump the bar for inclusion on that list in the first place. TKK! bark with me! 01:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Poodle hybrids, this debate has happened before, and I doubt the outcome would be much different.Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- I find this page helpful and useful. Perhaps the references can be edited but I would find re-listing to poodle hybrids to be detrimental. In particular, this is the dog breed of interest! Regarding "non-notable," Google trends says interest has continued to increase since 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.48.117.124 (talk) 00:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect per drewmutt. We don't need an article about every crossbreed. Primefac (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.