Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhard Steffen (computer scientist)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Bernhard Steffen (computer scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article written by a one-edit brand new editor, Bdfis. Given the pattern, I wonder if the user is the subject of the article.
Does not meet the notability guidelines for professors/academics. ColonelHenry (talk) 05:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep His Google Scholar profile (linked under EL in the article) shows several articles cited hundreds of times each, a total of almost 9000 citations, and an h-index of 47. Easy pass of WP:PROF#1. --Randykitty (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment As editor-in-chief of a major international journal (International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer he also passes PROF#8. --Randykitty (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per the multiple passes of WP:PROF criteria demonstrated by Randykitty. In addition, although I'm not entirely sure how the German system works in this regard, his chair seems to be one step higher than a normal full professor position (it's a position he earned four years after becoming full professor but I can't tell whether that was a lateral move or step up) so may pass WP:PROF#C5. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I created this entry, Barry Floyd (Professor of Information Systems and Management, Cal Poly - SLO). Bernhard Steffen meets the notability criteria for academics on points 5, 6 and 8. The 'orphan' issue is resolved through an update I made today on the page [1] (the previous version of the page pointed to a different Bernhard Steffen, a soccer player in the '60s). In the German system there are higher ranks than a normal full professor (called "weitere Rufe") though the academic title remains the same. Bernhard Steffen is generally considered 2 levels higher than a full professor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdfis (talk • contribs) 01:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- You should not feel obligated to reveal your identity here (see WP:PRIVACY) but thanks for clearing up the nominator's concern over a potential COI. And welcome to Wikipedia; I hope you continue finding worthy subjects such as this one to add to the encyclopedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Stunning pass of WP:Prof#C1 plus #8 and probably #5. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.