Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Blocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Blocks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A web startup. With a cloud-based product. We're knee-deep in these things and it's hard to see why this one is notable for either technical innovation nor corporate significance. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete spam. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG -- HighKing⁺⁺14:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject is not significantly notable. Just another cloud-based company with little coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Google translate shows that the alkmaarcentraal.nl article is just an announcement that betty blocks staff volunteered for a cleanup project. The Gartner report is inaccessable (and $1200), but on its own insufficient to establish notability. A search turned up no additional significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- insufficient coverage to establish notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.